TRV refusals are commonly based on:

• Lack of ties to home country
• Unclear travel purpose
• Financial insufficiency
• Prior immigration history

We prepare legally robust reapplications and/or Requests for Reconsideration, referencing section 179 of IRPR, clarifying misinterpretations, and supplementing applications with persuasive documentation (affidavits, declarations, travel intent letters).

Refusals often cite:

• Unclear educational intent
• Insufficient financial support
• Questionable academic progression
• Lack of evidence of return intent

We provide strategic re-filings with new statutory declarations, academic rationale letters, and clarified documentation to directly address officer concerns. Many of our clients have obtained approvals after multiple prior refusals.

Common refusal reasons:

• Employment offer credibility
• Employer non-compliance
• Incomplete documentation
• Intent to return to home country

We respond with fully revised submissions citing IRPR ss. 200–205, ensuring employer compliance, job match to NOC requirements, and purpose of stay. We also represent employers with restructured LMIA-based or IMP applications.

The Immigration Appeal Division (IAD) of the Immigration and Refugee Board (IRB) provides a legal forum to challenge specific types of refusals and removal orders. Our team offers detailed case preparation, legal submissions, and hearing representation for IAD matters, including:

Governing Law: IRPA s.63(1)

If your spousal, common-law, or parental sponsorship application was refused by IRCC due to concerns about genuineness, inadmissibility, or financial ineligibility, you have the right to appeal the decision to the IAD.

We represent clients in:

• Spouse/Common-law partner sponsorship refusals
• Parent/Grandparent sponsorship refusals
• Cases involving alleged misrepresentation or non-genuine relationships

Our office prepares comprehensive legal arguments, evidence packages, and sworn declarations to demonstrate the genuine nature of the relationship, rehabilitative factors (where applicable), and IRCC’s misapplication of law or discretion

Governing Law: IRPA s.63(4)

Permanent residents who have failed to meet the 730-day residency obligation in a five-year period may face a loss of status determination or removal order. If a PR card renewal is denied on these grounds, you may file an appeal to the IAD.

We present compelling arguments under humanitarian and compassionate (H&C) grounds, demonstrating:

• Best interests of the child
• Medical or family hardship
• Compelling reasons for absence
• Establishment in Canada

We prepare full disclosure packages and legal submissions citing IRPA s.28, relevant IRCC policy instruments, and Federal Court jurisprudence supporting discretionary relief.

• Reconsideration Requests to IRCC/CBSA
• Restoration of Status Applications
• Applications for Leave and Judicial Review at the Federal Court of Canada
• Temporary Resident Permits (TRP) and Humanitarian & Compassionate (H&C) applications